Search for: "Mark D Ware"
Results 81 - 100
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 4:58 am
As a preliminary matter, I’d like to dispense with two basic points: first, the bags in question are protected by trademark, not copyright. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Access Copyright (IP Osgoode) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CIPO Wares and Services Manual contracts again (Trade Mark Blog) Robertson class action settlement #2 decision released: Heather Robertson v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:56 am
"Mark Johnson Joins Zite as CEO & Zite Releases v1.1" http://j.mp/fSfWqa corinne grant writes at the drum ... [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Regal Ware, Inc., et. al. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
Regal Ware, Inc., et. al., 3-10-cv-00168 (WIWD March 15, 2011, Order) (Conley, J.) [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
When visiting Dharavi in the company of peripatetic Jockin Arputham, I accompanied him through Mankhurd and saw him chew out shopkeepers who’d expanded their display wares onto the sidewalk. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Angel Martinez, Decker's chairman and CEO stated that:“The success of Ugg Australia has created an entire industry of companies that market their wares by deliberately confusing consumers. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:11 am
”It’s been known anecdotally,” says researcher Mark Ware, MD, assistant professor of anesthesia and family medicine at McGill University in Montreal. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:27 pm
D. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:02 am
” For those who would ask “Why’d you want to be a lawyer in the first place? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:11 pm
Décarie Motors Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Kay and Mark E. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Cochlear Corp (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Patentee’s ‘policy and practice’ of marking was insufficient to establish compliance with marking requirement: von Holdt v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
Instead, the Board queried “how any reasonable person would be satisfied that he/she was entitled to file trademark applications for over 18 arguably well known marks for arguably related wares and/or services. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:55 pm
d. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:13 am
Mark your diaries ...! [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:35 pm
This Blawg Review comes to you from the Canadian Trademark Blog, resident in Vancouver, British Columbia – a blawg run by several of the talented trademark law practitioners at Clark Wilson LLP. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
The Court then went on to find that the marks were contrary to section 10 of the Act (which prohibits adoption as a trade-mark of a mark that has by ordinary commercial usage become recognized as designating the kind, quality, quantity, destination, value, place of origin or date of production of any wares or services), as well as 7(d) of the Act (which prohibits a person from using a description in association with wares or services that… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) Global Global – General Why no one is reading this post (IP Think Tank) It’s the silly season but this is ridiculous (IP Think Tank) Year end wishes for… [read post]
