Search for: "Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 81 - 100 of 740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am by James Segroves
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The new Easter legal term begins this week on Tuesday 18 April 2023 and finishes on Friday 26 May 2023. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by James Segroves
What’s this about the “Commissioner of Social Security” and claims arising under subchapter II? [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am by Unknown
According to the rulemaking petition, the soon-to-be-argued Supreme Court case Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Part of Just Security’s coverage of the Manhattan DA investigation and work on accountability and corruption. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The BBC said the decision was “based on concerns raised by government authorities worldwide regarding data privacy and security. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
A HackedOff blog post has warned that the National Security Bill may undermine journalists’ ability to do their job. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) statement can be read here. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
Critics say the law may require companies to scan encrypted messages for unlawful material. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner, Professor Fraser Sampson, has warned of the danger of planned legal changes to the oversight of surveillance technology. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]