Search for: "McAllister v. McAllister" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the accused such… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the accused such… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:26 pm by laurahess
These questions arose in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:32 am by Rob
The long awaited decision in Brinker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm by lawshucks
Apparently, she was also involved in a case called Alexander v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:59 am by Lawrence Solum
McAllister (University of Kansas - School of Law) has posted A Marbury v. [read post]