Search for: "Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp."
Results 81 - 100
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
Under the 1970 Agreement, outside of the US and Canada Merck US could only use the name ‘Merck’ if accompanied with due prominence by the rest of its company name ‘Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp’ or a geographical indication (i.e. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. argued a U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Target Corp., 30 N.E.3d 404 (Ill. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 9:36 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:59 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:53 pm
Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Tasuku Honjo • Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:52 pm
• Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; N.V. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
A couple of days ago, we watched the lovely “St. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 2015 U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
The Inn Sign for the Beehive public house in Grantham Photo Wikipedia The Lincolnshire town of Grantham educated one of the world's greatest scientists and the first woman ti be British prime minister (see "Frit" - Merck Sharp Dohme Corp v Teva Pharma BV 25 March 2012). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
The UK High Court recently gave its judgment in the case of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd (collectively referred to in the judgement as BMS) v Teva Pharma B.V. and Teva UK Ltd (Teva) (decision). [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:22 pm
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. 11-4358-cv (2nd Cir., Jan. 30, 2013). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. 11-4358, slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 807 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Mich. [read post]
