Search for: "Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp."
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme is upon us. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Edition 178 of Never Too Late is here to recap last week’s highlights here on the IPKat (week ending 14th January)A Merck-y appeal is remitted to the High CourtThe longstanding dispute relating to various issues over the use of the MERCK trade mark is set to continue The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has remitted Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 case back to the… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:42 pm
With the consent of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the Court hereby appoints John D. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd; Microsoft Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Nokia UK Ltd; NXP Semiconductors UK Limited; Pfizer Ltd; Philips Electronics UK Ltd; Pilkington Group… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. 11-4358, slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:17 pm
Ltd [2022] FCAFC 39 (‘Ono’); and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 40 (‘MSD’). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:45 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
Three More Lawsuits (Boles, Jellema, and Spano) Set For Trial, And A Special Master Appointed To Conduct Settlement Talks (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) There are currently more than 900 Fosamax lawsuits pending against defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:42 pm
Karst – Among the Warning Letters FDA posted on its website this week, one in particular caught our attention – a February 17, 2012 Warning Letter to Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:49 am
MERCK in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:43 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 807 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Mich. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
