Search for: "Microsoft Corporation v. Does 1-18" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm by Howard Knopf
As well, there are “must read” submissions from Pam Samuelson and many notable advocacy groups on all sides, and corporate interests, including Microsoft and AT&T.There is no doubt that Judge Chin will have his hands full with this case, and they eyes of the entire copyright world will be focussed on him. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Electronic Frontier Foundation)   Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 23 June: US LSI: ‘Multilateral patents’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 23 June: STEP / Committee on National Statistics conference on ‘Intangible assets: measuring and enhancing their contribution to corporate value and… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966), the court must consider (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the difference between the prior art and the claimed invention; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the art; and (4) any objective evidence of nonobviousness. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  (part 2) The last post in this series[1] addressed how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their development relies on use of other people's creative works, often without notice or consent. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Internet service providers are corporations which can well afford the cost of setting up self-regulation systems of this nature. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And, they argue, the law that mainly was used against them — the sweeping anti-racketeering law that Congress passed in 1970 (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO) was pulled completely out of shape to try to make it cover a half-century of corporate conduct. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 But some justices also raised concerns that a decision siding with the television broadcasters could have far-reaching effects on new Internet, cloud and other technologies - and companies such as Google, Microsoft, DropBox and Box would then be swept up in other questions about the reach of copyright laws. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Pursuant to the settlement, the defendants agreed to pay a total of over $18 million in disgorgement, civil penalties and interest. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
"(1) The Section 2 Report reflects a significant effort by my predecessors and the FTC in collecting and evaluating the opinions and expertise of antitrust enforcement officials from the United States and abroad, leading economists and legal scholars, antitrust practitioners, and representatives of the business community. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent… [read post]