Search for: "More v. Collection Professionals Inc et al" Results 81 - 100 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The new policy claims the collection of biometric information is “for safety, security, and identification purposes. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:56 am by David J. DePaolo
This is offensive to many fans, who complain that football is by its nature a violent sport, that players are paid a lot of money to engage in the sport and that they should stop crying.The collective bargaining agreements that the players sign contain jurisdictional clauses for workers' compensation purposes to limit forum shopping so that players can not avail themselves of California law or other liberal work comp state laws.WorkCompCentral legal editor, Sherri Okamoto, this morning… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Our message through these actions and orders could not be more clear: we take compliance with Rule 21F-17 very seriously, and so should each of you who work in a compliance function or advise companies. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The firm then collected close to $21 million in the second matter, Spano v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Formerly the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, she served as Legislative Liaison for the Native American Rights Fund and in the Carter Administration, and was lead plaintiff in Harjo et al v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]