Search for: "O.R." Results 81 - 100 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2010, 7:22 am by emagraken
Woolley, Hames,Dale & Dingwall (1982), 35 O.R.(2d) 599 (C.A.), leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37 O.R.(2d) 499. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm
Rose (2006), 81 O.R. (3d) 349 (Sup. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
 Calvert (1997), 32 O.R. (3d) 281 (Ont. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:35 am by Stephen Pitel
Nutrisystem.com Inc. (2001), 55 O.R. (3d) 334 (S.C.J.), had concluded that because a domain name lacks a physical existence it was not “property in Ontario” and the mere fact the domain name was registered through a corporation that happened to carry on business in Ontario (the domain name Registrar) did not give it a physical presence here. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
Re Lloyd, 24 O.R. (2d) 340, is a 1979 decision by the Ontario Surrogate Court, as it was called. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:14 am by Heather Douglas
Referencing the case Jones v Tsige, 108 O.R. (3d) 241, 2012 ONCA 32, Justice Vella stated the elements of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion as follows: (a) The responding party’s conduct must be intentional, which includes reckless behaviour; (b) The responding party must have invaded, without lawful justification, the moving party’s private affairs or concerns; and (c) A reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive causing distress, humiliation, or… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 8:18 am by David M. Boertje
These options are: Cash bail – paying the full amount of bail in cash  O.R. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:50 pm
York (City) (1995), 23 O.R. (3d) 161 (C.A.)) [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 9:04 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Portland City Auditor Chief Hearings Officer, Portland, O.R. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:08 am by emagraken
Campbell (1986), 54 O.R. (2d) 443 (H.C.) [9] I have concluded that the discontinuance filed in this matter does not preclude me from signing and entering the Order without the signatures of counsel. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
Bouckhuyt (1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 640 (C.A.), was that a discretionary licence issued by a government body grants a mere revocable privilege and not a property right. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc. (1993), 16 O.R. (3d) 250, which requires strong affidavit evidence to demonstrate a "substantial and unexpected change in circumstances to the extent that to refuse the order would be manifestly unjust". [read post]