Search for: "PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT" Results 81 - 100 of 75,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Roughly speaking, plaintiffs in northern Illinois, which is more urban, lost; plaintiffs in southern Illinois, which is more rural, were successful, and a judge there held that the statute was unconstitutional in all its applications and barred the state from enforcing it. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The basis for the plaintiff’s allegations was the defendant’s conduct in the 2011 action, consisting of, inter alia, an alleged deceitful representation by the defendant in response to the plaintiff’s discovery demands, wherein the defendant represented that there were no notes taken by Town employees related to the plaintiff’s alleged violations of the Town Code, and the defendant’s alleged deceitful… [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
If plaintiffs cannot provide such a map, Alito emphasized, “it is difficult for plaintiffs to defeat our starting presumption that the legislature acted in good faith. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:40 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Moreover, defenses that are unique to a named plaintiff are relevant to the inquiry into whether plaintiff’s claims are typical but are not necessarily dispositive of the issue (Sebo v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Takeaways More data scraping defendants likely will argue “conflict preemption. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
Selected Posts About State Action Claims Jawboning Defendants Are 6-for-6 in the Ninth Circuit–Hart v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
When evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate (see Guggenheimer v… [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
When evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate (see Guggenheimer v… [read post]