Search for: "Paras Shah"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
An excellent survey is provided by Shah, N., Promises to Keep: Diplomatic Assurances Against Torture in US Terrorism Transfers (Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute, New York, 2010). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm
Further Para 15(iii) of Annexure D protects Pakistan's "then existing" downstream agricultural and hydroelectric use by Pakistan. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:58 am
Thanks go to NTEU attorney Paras Shah for leading the writing and filing of this amicus brief. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
The Court, however, expressed its reservation about the correctness of the view taken in Sadanandan Bhadran’s case (supra) especially in para 9 thereof and accordingly referred the matter to a larger Bench. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:20 am
In Shah v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am
., Judges Higgins, Koojimans and Burgenthal, Arrest Warrant case, para 51). [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
In Kanti Bhadra Shah & Anr. vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
The problem with this reconciliation is the generality of the observations in ¶14 reproduced above, which suggest that the Court was not deciding the case on this narrow ground alone. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(IAM) Two tools for selecting a suggestive trademark over a descriptive trademark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TRIPS Council (24-25 Oct 2011) will discuss Para 6 implementation, Australia’s tobacco plain packaging bill 2011 and enforcement (KEI) Global – Patents Private and social costs of patent trolls (IP finance) Featured resource: ArchPatent (Patent Quality Matters) Australia APO: Assuming next-day delivery of mail an ‘error’: TransLang Technology v… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
Sathasivam Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in Shah Nawaz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
Shah J., who pointed out that the “ratio in the case of V.B. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
In this connection, the respondents have referred to para 6(i) to (x) and (xiii) of the petition, wherein it is alleged that the applicant company M/s Caparo Maruti Ltd was incorporated by Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:41 am
In the case of Justice Shah, the media reports suggest that on both occasions, the collegium did not approve the appointment of Justice Shah. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
No. 2836, 20 B.C.L.R. (3d) 393, at para. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:16 am
Hat tip to Bhushan Shah for sending in the link to the news report. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
Regulate technology, not lives: A critique of the draft ART (Regulation) bill by Chayanika Shah c. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:02 am
I. [read post]
