Search for: "Parrot, Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 5:21 am
[The first sentence is essentially parroting an integer of claim 1; the second sentence is parroting claim 3] Specifically, the judge found, that “claim 3 broadly mirrors the words used in the last sentence of paragraph 17, and is, as it seems to be, envisaging a different position closer to the second intermediate image than claim 1, but not on it [the image plane] or on the eyepiece side of it. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 12:23 pm
By Jason Rantanen Biogen Idec, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:33 pm
The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Usually, even when it’s legal and encouraged, parroting is not desired. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:30 pm
Cir. 2005); ACCO Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Yunker v Pandora Media, Inc., 2013 US Dist LEXIS 42691 (N.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:42 am
Will you change your headline, or will you just parrot the headline? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., SUCV2009-05286-A, slip op. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The session was a unique opportunity to interact with parliamentarians from across the political spectrum and although several trite responses were duly parroted, there were some well-articulated positions along with encouraging passion for convictions. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
ATA Airlines Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:45 pm
Barr Laboratories Inc., C.A. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:34 am
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00837, 2012 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
Horton, Inc., Case No. 12-CA-25764 (dated Jan. 3, 2012), an undaunted National Labor Relations Board concluded, in spite of these holdings, that a class action waiver contained in an arbitration agreement constituted an unfair labor practice. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:07 pm
To add insult to injury, the story is “corroborated” by the senators’ parroting, without caveats, claims by Google’s rivals that they are harmed by Google’s favoring its own content, and that “they would not attempt to launch their companies today given GoogIe’s current practices. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
To add insult to injury, the story is “corroborated” by the senators’ parroting, without caveats, claims by Google’s rivals that they are harmed by Google’s favoring its own content, and that “they would not attempt to launch their companies today given GoogIe’s current practices. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
(The VMO is way off topic today, hope you don’t mind. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
The Supreme Court's June 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:02 am
Unidad of Miami Beach, Inc., 2011 WL 2983671 (S.D. [read post]