Search for: "People v. Johnson (1988)"
Results 81 - 100
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
App. 212, 222 (1988). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Johnson & another Whether the criminal harassment statute, G. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Ct. 1988)), and now Hoven v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
At the opposite end of the spectrum, however, the California Supreme Court enforced a surrogacy agreement in a 1993 case, Johnson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Supp. 2d 745 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (Sikh employee who objected to a hardhat requirement when that interfered with his ability to wear a religiously prescribed turban) [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Johnson). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 412 (1989) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
This text may seem a little puzzling to people who don't walk the streets of London, but there was some rhyme and reason: it was in response to a very striking advertisement by gay rights campaign organisation Stonewall, which read: "SOME PEOPLE ARE GAY, GET OVER IT!" [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
See, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
On the other hand, Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
“We can change peoples lives. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
See Glik v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 5:05 pm
Defendant asserts that “in the said case, a hearing pursuant to People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Johnson, Mark Dean, ed. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:32 am
Old-timers will have flashbacks of controversial Rule 19c-4 - which was adopted in 1988 to limit the ability of companies to deviate from "one share, one vote" - and which was struck down in 1990 by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
