Search for: "Phillip Kerr"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
The CAFA Law Blog is your one stop shop for all things CAFA. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
The Respondents, represented by Carter Phillips, took the view that no line drawing was required: As long as the inspection was only visual inspection of the outside of a person’s body, then the Fourth Amendment did not apply at all upon entering a prison. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
(Orin Kerr) I attended the oral argument this morning in Florence v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:39 am
Kerr & Peter W. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The appeals were heard by a seven justice panel of Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
This will be heard by Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson on Wednesday 27 July 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Phillips would also dismiss the appeal but for different reasons. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week commencing with the two day hearing of R v Gnango on Monday 11 and Tuesday 12 July 2011 to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The minority (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) went further, finding that this lack of causation should have prevented a cause of action accruing at all. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
The two appeals in the Privy Council this week are to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Sir Patrick Coghlin. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
The seven-judge bench, consisting of Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Dyson, unanimously dismissed both appeals and upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that the Fairchild exception to the conventional rule on causation, which applies in “multiple exposure” mesothelioma cases (that is, where the claimant has contracted mesothelioma after being wrongly exposed to asbestos by several defendants) also applies to… [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The case of E (Children) will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
