Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service" Results 81 - 100 of 822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Recently, in the Google v Equustek litigation, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that Google had carried on business in the forum by collecting data, providing search services, and mining AdWords revenue. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:15 am by Steven G. Pearl
” Futrell also presented evidence that Payday was considered by the Internal Revenue Service as an employer of record for income tax and unemployment insurance purposes. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
”[16] But even with an all-of-the-above tax approach to multinationals, it is questionable whether the revenue will be a significant contributor to finance the deficits that are currently being accumulated or if it will simply be another layer of complexity in the international tax system. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
The GST Council is a council envisaged under the Amendment, with powers to ‘recommend’ (it is unclear if the recommendations are binding) tax rates, goods and services to be to subjected to or exempted from GST, taxes to be subsumed under the GST, matters of apportionment, etc. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
  Employers would continue their efforts to come into compliance with PPACA and the proliferation of rulemaking from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service implementing PPACA. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm by Patti Spencer
Verrilli Jr. was that the "penalty" imposed on persons who do not purchase medical insurance in accordance with the mandate, although collected by the internal revenue service with the income tax and dependent on income levels, is not itself a tax, therefore the Anti-Injunction Act is inapplicable. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
TheCTA exempts twenty-four kinds of entities from its reporting requirements,including banks, insurance companies, and entities with more than twentyemployees, five million dollars in gross revenue, and a physical office in the UnitedStates. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 12/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The man, Vincent Burroughs, filed the lawsuit on January 25, 2013, against the IRS and Internal Revenue Service agent, Dora Abrahamson. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia against the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service in order to obtain President Trump's tax returns. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:28 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, as the power of the Internet has grown, so has the reach of Section 230 immunity. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:03 am by Liz Dunshee
On these calls, the AT&T executives allegedly disclosed AT&T’s internal smartphone sales data and the impact of that data on internal revenue metrics, despite the fact that internal documents specifically informed Investor Relations personnel that AT&T’s revenue and sales of smartphones were types of information generally considered “material” to AT&T investors, and therefore prohibited from selective disclosure… [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the complaint sufficiently alleges that Levine subsequently represented plaintiffs in connection with audits by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York Department of Taxation and Finance (NYDTF) and in tax litigation continuously from May 16, 2008, the date Boesky signed a power of attorney permitting Levine to represent him before the NYDTF, through 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:45 pm
These models include very little, if any, advanced cash, with most of the patent owner’s revenue being generated through licensing services. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
So manifest were the transgressions inherent in this situation, that the issue has been the subject of a plethora of recent decisions, as well as investigations by the Internal Revenue Service and debate by the Surrogate's Association. [read post]