Search for: "ROBERT BUSH " Results 81 - 100 of 3,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
As the Moore majority observed, in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
Kavanaugh indicated that he would adopt the “straightforward” test outlined by Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In Massachusetts, a blue state sought environmental regulation from the Bush administration. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Bush: "The Court has been careful not to foreclose the possibility that the protections of the Suspension Clause have expanded along with post-1789 developments that define the present scope of the writ. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
Bush Administration issuing prompt letters and Circular A-4; and the Obama administration emphasizing dignity and retrospective review. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Guest Author
  My empirical study of EPA’s CBAs of major rules during much of the Bush II and Obama administrations revealed that the agency was unable to monetize significant categories of regulatory benefit 83 percent of the time, making any calculation of net benefits impossible. [read post]
Professor Sivas’s litigation successes include challenging the Bush administration’s gas mileage standards for SUVs and light trucks and holding the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am by Amy Howe
Robert Bevis, the owner of a gun store in Naperville, and a gun-rights group went to federal court in Illinois to challenge the laws, arguing that they violated the Second Amendment. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:09 am by David Oscar Markus
  From the conclusion:John Roberts cannot accept that these justices are incapable of policing themselves. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:04 am by John Lande
Thanks to Andrea Schneider, the Cardozo Journal on Dispute Resolution’s faculty advisor, and its editors, the Journal just published articles by Professor Robert A. [read post]
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]