Search for: "ROBERT W POWERS" Results 81 - 100 of 1,788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Justice Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan and Barrett, which agreed with the majority on the judgment only. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Chief Justice Roberts pointedly declined to adopt the Rehnquist standard for federal court review of state courts in this realm and, more fundamentally, Roberts rejected the premise of Rehnquist’s approach, which was that the Elections Clause is one of “a few exceptional cases in which the Constitution imposes a duty or confers a power on [and insulates from judicial review under the state Constitution] a particular” entity within a state’s… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  “[W]henever any Form of Government becomes destructive of [the ends instantiated in ‘the people’], it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
W]hat cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.... [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
” Although “[r]easonable minds may disagree with our analysis,” including the court’s liberal justices,” Roberts acknowledged, “[w]e do not mistake this plainly heartfelt disagreement for disparagement. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am by Robert Liles
The MFCU works closely with Federal and State law enforcement agencies, and it has the power to arrest, prosecute, and bring legal action against individuals or organizations engaged in Medicaid fraud. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:52 am by DONALD SCARINCI
  “The County had the power to sell Tyler’s home to recover the unpaid property taxes. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
” These courts effectively gave the Court a power the Constitution hadn’t given it and the Court itself hadn’t claimed—the power to make law by issuing unexplained pronouncements on issues not presented.Other courts attempted to reconcile the Court’s dictum with its holding. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am by INFORRM
The petitioner Robert Bropho had appealed to the Federal Court of Australia on the grounds that the primary judge had erred in law in finding that although the cartoon “A [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by James Kraska
O’Connell, e.g., and in the field of the law of naval warfare, Robert W. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
”[3] The question presented before the Supreme Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ilya Somin
As he points out, "[w]henever government gets rid of restrictive regulations, people who gained from those regulations will lose. [read post]