Search for: "S.C.R."
Results 81 - 100
of 897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm
In Tolofson, at p. 1049 S.C.R., La Forest J. explained the distinction as follows: [The real and substantial connection] test has the effect of preventing a court from unduly entering into matters in which the jurisdiction in which it is located has little interest. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am
Burns, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656, at p. 665). [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am
Ewanchuk, 1999 CanLII 711 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330, at para. 28. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Grain Growers 1997 CanLII 332 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701, 735, 219 N.R. 161, 152 D.L.R. (4th) 1, 27-28 (paras. 75-76); Desforge v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm
Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 326 (“SOCAN 2012”), at paras. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
Negligence is determined by a standard of care that a relevant prudent person would undertake, rather than the results that such a theoretical person would seek to attain or avoid. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Debot, 1989 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140; (b) the judicial summary was inadequate; and (c) the trial judge erred in relying on redacted information that he could not challenge. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 8:44 pm
Alberta, 1998 CanLII 816 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493, this Court held that “[i]t is not necessary to find that the legislation creates the discrimination existing in society” to find a s. 15 breach (para. 84 (emphasis in original)). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Mack, 1988 CanLII 24 (SCC), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, at p. 961). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
McNeil, 2009 SCC 3, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 66. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
., 2000 SCC 12 (CanLII), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 298:… (Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 3. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:04 pm
New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 (CanLII), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190: that judicial review functions to maintain the rule of law while giving effect to legislative intent. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
Babos, 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 309, at para. 41. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Quebec (Attorney General), 1989 CanLII 87 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927, at p. 1004. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Hiemstra, 2006 SCC 37, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231, this Court interpreted s. 15.1 of the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.), as precluding a court from granting an order on an original application for retroactive child support unless the child beneficiary is a “child of the marriage”, as defined in the Divorce Act, when the application is made. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
., 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, at para. 2, per McLachlin C.J. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
The Queen in right of Alberta, 1971 CanLII 175 (SCC), [1972] S.C.R. 419; Bain v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. [read post]
