Search for: "Saucier" Results 81 - 100 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2009, 2:31 am
Callahan [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the test for whether a government official is entitled to qualified immunity, established by the Court in 2001 in Saucier v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:19 am
I predicted that the court would overrule Saucier here.It's a seemingly technical question of the order in which a court ought to decide whether there is a violation of a constitutional right and whether a state official ought reasonably to have known that. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
  With the continued viability of Saucier hanging in the balance in Pearson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 1:46 pm
I also want to thank blogger Christina Samuels of the On Special Education blog for picking up on some of my saucier comments in that post:[blogs.edweek.org]------- Thanks for subscribing! [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:48 pm
This is important because the qualified immunity test maintained in Saucier essentially makes it impossible to [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
There is, in addition, a procedural issue that may prevent the Court from reaching the merits: whether to overrule Saucier v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
In addition to the questions presented, the Court directed the parties to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the Court’s decision in Saucier v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
The Court also directed the parties to address the issue of whether Saucier v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
Callahan (07-751), to be argued October 14, where the Justices asked the parties to brief the question of whether to overrule Saucier v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:23 pm
  In granting review, the Court asked the lawyers to argue whether it should overrule its 2001 decision in Saucier v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 5:03 am
Callahan next term: the wisdom and legality of the order-of-decisionmaking rule the Court prescribed in Saucier v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:36 pm
" See Saucier, 533 U.S. at 205-06 (discussing excessive force claims while noting that excessive force and probable cause determinations are subject to same Fourth Amendment analysis). [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
Paul Hughes has a paper titled "Not a Failed Experiment: Wilson-Saucier Sequencing and the Articulation of Constitutional Rights" (abstract with link for download; via "Legal Theory Blog"). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
But Wilson-Saucier sequencing has come under significant attack. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 2:47 pm
See Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201 ("If no constitutional right would have been violated were the allegations established, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity. [read post]