Search for: "Scott Schmidt" Results 81 - 100 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
 of the Philadelphia office of Cozen & O'Connor and Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The court felt that any potential confusion or prejudice could be addressed by way of jury instructions and argument of counsel.The court otherwise ruled on a separate motion that the plaintiff would be allowed to pursue a recovery of her co-pays and deductible related to medical expenses as those expenses were not "paid or payable" as defined by Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility law.Anyone wishing to review Judge Munley's decision in the Rodkey case may click… [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania law firm of Schmidt Kramer for sending this case to my attention. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer P.C. for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  The companion Order denying the Motion can be viewed HERE.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Anyone wishing to view the Opinion may click this link:http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/A08027_13.pdf I send thanks to Attorney Joe Walsh of Walsh Pancio in Lansdale, PA, Attorney Scott Cooper of Schmidt Kramer in Harrisburg, PA, and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Daniel E. Cummins
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer, as well as Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court also noted that evidence of a Defendant's not stopping for an accident was not admissible for alleged impeachment purposes in this case since such evidence had little or no probative value and was extremely prejudicial where the Defendant admitted liability.Anyone desiring a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The accompanying Court Order can be viewed HERE.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Schmidt Kramer law firm in Harrisburg, PA for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Part of the reason the Bransfield court declined to decide the issue was to avoid a scenario where its decision could end up conflicting with how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may ultimately rule upon the issue in Toner.Ultimately, the Branfield court denied the carrier’s request to reconsider the court’s prior Order remanding the matter back to state court.Anyone wishing to review this unpublished memorandum opinion in Bransfield may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney… [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
I send thanks to Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA law office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price, as well as Scott Cooper, Esq. of the Harrisburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer, for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer P.C., for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cooper of the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harriburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
20 May 2020, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
"  See Op. at p. 5.Anyone wishing to review this case may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 Applying F.R.C.P. 35 to the case before it, the Loughery court found that there was good cause shown by the carrier for the exam.Anyone wishing to review this decision by Western Federal Magistrate Judge Dodge may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]