Search for: "Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Comment k says unavoidably unsafe products are “especially common” in the context of prescription medical products (actually, it says “drugs” but “medical devices” weren’t recognized as a separate category of products in the early 1960s – the Medical Device Amendments still being more than a decade in the future). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
563 A.2d at 126-27.Numerous other courts throughout the country have held, similarly to Smith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
He decided to use the selection of cases provided by our post-Riegel preemption scorecard, which at the time had seventy-five decisions in it.Between February 20, 2008, the date the Riegel case was decided, and July 15, 2010, American courts have ruled on 75 cases involving devices the FDA preapproved for the market under § 360k of the Medical Device Amendments.7575 See Jim Beck & Mark Herrmann, (New) Medical Device Preemption Scorecard.5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
American Medical Systems, Inc., 958 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
New York Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2007. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Smith, 996 S.W.2d 518, 521 (Mo.App. 1999). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
The systemic urge to aggregate litigation must not be allowed to trum [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
LARACH and GREAT AMERICAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued two decisions just two days apart in favor of employers sued for alleged violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)OSHA issues rules governing whistleblower complaint procedures under various statutesLittler Mendelson PCThe Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will issue three interim final rules that outline the procedures for handling retaliation complaints under the whistleblower provisions of the Surface… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
By the time of the American Revolution, anti-suit injunctions were viewed with circumspection. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
American Home Products, Inc., slip op. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(American IPA) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
”Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Wyeth, Inc., 601 F.Supp.2d 1262 (W.D.Okla. 2009), which was decided 5 days before Stacel. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
” Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
