Search for: "Sui Juris" Results 81 - 100 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2014, 7:25 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
., the vaginal mesh manufacturer was ordered by the jury to pay $26.7 million to a group of four women who blamed the company’s vaginal mesh inserts for their personal injuries. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:11 pm
The Court of Appeals of this state regards as settled law that the legality of a marriage between persons sui juris is to be determined by the law of the place where it is celebrated, unless it is repugnant to the public policy of this state, such as marriages prohibited by positive statute and those which contravene natural law. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:29 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Texas Jury Hammers Boston Scientific $75 M Last month, a Texas jury ordered Boston Scientific to pay $73 million in damages to a woman who injured by a defectively designed implant, which left her in constant pain. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
  Dead people aren’t sui juris – the dead have no standing to sue – as we’ve discussed several times (links here) when a few pre-deceased plaintiff were discovered in the Aredia/Zometalitigation, and their ostensible counsel were sanctioned with costs as a result. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Bryan Hawkins
 The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that there was sufficient evidence supporting the inference that Sui Juris lacked managerial independence. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 7:38 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
According to a Massachusetts jury, Boston Scientific’s vaginal-mesh sling was not defectively designed and the company properly warned about its health risks. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Instead, a declaratory judgment "is a remedy sui generis and escapes both the substantive objections and procedural limitations of special writs and extraordinary remedies". [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
A Massachusetts state jury found for the defense, in the first of more than 20,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits filed against Boston Scientific. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
In several of the proceedings, a series of bellwether trials or mini trials, have been set to help the parties determine how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Three other vaginal mesh cases have gone before state court juries, in July 2012, a California jury awarded $5.5 million in damages against C.R. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jackson, 2013 ONCA 632  [1] After a month-long trial for first-degree murder, Douglas Jackson was convicted of second degree murder by a judge sitting with a jury. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
The rest of last week’s repeat offenders are back for another dip in the cert. pool, including the sui generis Ryan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung's counsel, in a transparent attempt to reduce the impact of Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller's testimony but nevertheless on a factual basis, drew the jury's attention to Apple's concern about a Wall Street Journal article entitled "Has Apple Lost Its Cool to Samsung?". [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:14 am
Vaginal mesh devices are used to treat Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) in women. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:04 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Transvaginal mesh was used for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:49 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
In July 2012, a California state court jury awarded $5.5 million in damages against C.R. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Recognizing there is no constitutional jury trial right for a "petty" offense does not, however, resolve all the constitutional issues raised by the use of CPL 400.40 in this case. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:25 am by David Bernstein
It seems to us that the real object and purpose were simply to regulate the hours of labor between the master and his employé (all being men, sui juris), in a private business, not dangerous in any degree to morals or in any real and substantial degree, to the health of the employés. [read post]