Search for: "The Power of Few, LLC v. Does 1 - 13" Results 81 - 100 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
David Schwartz, of Innovative Science Solutions, LLC. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:47 am by Steven Boutwell
Both federal and Louisiana law strongly favor arbitration, and save a few exceptions, written pre-dispute arbitration agreements “shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
__________ ToNorges Bank5 April 2016Recommendation to exclude Duke Energy Corp., Duke Energy Carolinas LLC, Duke Energy Progress LLC and Progress Energy Inc. from the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG)  Confidential pursuant to section 13 subsection 1 of the Freedom of Information Act, cf section 3-4 subsection 1 of the Securities Trading Act.Summary The Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global recommends the exclusion… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
" The Constitution does not give the federal government the power to decided property rights in most contexts. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
 So, pour that last glass of egg nog and savor the last few hours of the year. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
 In particular, “Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
This addresses a problem seen, for example, in the decision in Lilly Icos LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
IntelliGender, LLC, -- F.3d ---, No. 13–56806, 2014 WL 5786718 (9th Cir. [read post]