Search for: "U. S. v. Marks" Results 81 - 100 of 1,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
S. 456, 464 (1996) (decisions about enforcement of “the Nation’s criminal laws” lie within the “special province of the Executive” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Buckley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
S., at 335–336 (internal quotation marks omitted).So is "critical mass" something no one believes in anymore? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am by Josh Blackman
S., at 833, n. 4 (internal quotation marks omitted); see id., at 839 (Brennan, J., concurring); cf. 5 U. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Frederick B. Goldsmith
The Marine Safety Alert draws from casualty investigations, including the D/V CONCEPTION casualty in which 33 passengers and one crew perished, and includes admonitions on use of open flame candles, Sterno heating cans, and plastic trash cans, storage of combustible materials close to ignition sources, and clearly marking engine room escape hatches.The post U.S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm by Will Baude
S. ___, ___ (2021) (slip op., at 13) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm by Holman
By Chris Holman Much has been already been written about the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Amgen v. [read post]