Search for: "Vermont Defender General's Office" Results 81 - 100 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 9:28 am by Andrew Delaney
The complainant testified to conduct consistent with a sexual act (aka penis to vagina), and the police officer testified to conduct of finger to vagina. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:46 am by SHG
Her plan B: landing a job in the Bronx public defender’s office. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm by Andrew Delaney
The third point is that the SCOV sees the Defender General as not helping petitioner regain his appeal right, even though, the SCOV opines, it was that office’s assigned counsel’s error that caused him to lose it in the first place. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:56 am
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:47 am by Andrew Delaney
Webster’s statement really wasn’t clear, and under federal law (and, by extension under Vermont law, because Vermont generally follows federal precedent for Miranda purposes), there was no obligation by the police to stop questioning or to find him a lawyer. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:14 am by Gangemi P.C.
” If that were not true, a simple denial by a corporate officer that the officer ever communicated the plaintiff’s complaint, no matter how reasonable the inference of communication, would prevent the plaintiff from satisfying her prima facie case, despite the fact that the prima facie case requires only a de minimis showing. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The defendants in the lawsuit are the California attorney general and Riverside County district attorney. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:20 am by Andrew Delaney
” Fraser designated the assistant city manager, Baker, to serve as the hearing officer. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm by Andrew Delaney
Generally, UPL has been defined broadly. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Andrew Delaney
’” Much like placing a china shop next to an overfilled pen of seeing-red bulls, public highway establishment through prescriptive easement under Vermont law is “generally hostile. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm by Adi Kamdar and Adi Kamdar
(Vermont went a step further and passed an anti-troll law.) [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The Vermont Attorney General’s Office estimates that defending a challenge over federal preemption would cost state taxpayers upwards of $5 million if it lost and without much in the way of legal fee recovery. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:37 am by Daniel Nazer
Back in 2011, This American Life toured an office building in Marshall, Texas, and found eerie hallways of empty offices that serve as the ‘headquarters’ of patent trolls. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a longish excerpt from the Slater decision, applying the duty to accommodate to the clerk’s specific religious objections: Plaintiff is a former ten-year employee of the County Clerk’s Office of defendant Douglas County .... [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  that under 42 USC § 1983 and state law.The Court of Claims granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim No. 126268 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office, and Claim No. 126067 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
It's similar to a bill enacted by the Vermont Legislature last year.The bill mentions that the state Attorney General is not meant to be restricted by this bill in any way, but the bill itself focuses on a defendant's right in bad-faith litigation or litigation following bad-faith demand letters. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 8:31 am by Andrew Delaney
One statute generally provides that if one has previously been convicted of DUI, it’s a crime to refuse a law-enforcement officer’s reasonable request for an evidentiary test. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 11:25 am by Kary L. Moss
We led the 2018 ballot initiative and are prepared to defend that win with measures that would prevent an election steal. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Hepps (1986) (generally rejecting the view that the burden of proving truth can be placed on the defendant); R.A.V. v. [read post]