Search for: "Williams v. Internal Revenue Service" Results 81 - 100 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Gallagher et al.Petitioners' reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association Title: Williams v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(IP Finance), (IAM)   Israel Israel Patent Office awards costs against patentee forced to amend claims by third party invalidation proceedings (IP Factor)   Korea Korea passes three-strikes copyright law (Managing IP)   New Zealand New Zealand Trade Marks Act amended to join Nice, Singapore, Madrid, bolster enforcement (IPKat)   South Africa South African Revenue Services (SARS) – tainting or tainted IP? [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am by Rob Robinson
Semantix’s majority shareholder, Segulah Fund V, was represented by William Blair International and Kanter Advokatbyrå. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:25 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Moreover, both Internal Revenue Code 6050I and 31 USC § 5331 mandate business operators--including sellers of antiquities--to document sales transactions over $10,000 on Form 8300. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:25 am by Ben
 The 'Blurred Lines' saga has drawn to a close after the deadline passed for Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke to take the case to US Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
Cases where fair use was rejected on this basis include Los Angeles News Service v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLPOn August 18, 2010 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No 33-9135, a cease and desist order (the Order) settling claims against the state of New Jersey as a result of what the SEC determined was inadequate disclosure of the financial condition of New Jersey's pension funds.Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plansHunton &… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Visit International News Ready to Litigate Through the Clouds? [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
He argues that declining revenues in traditional television packages are not “lost revenues” due to illegal streaming but rather that “the money is actually going” to paid Internet streaming services such as Netflix. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Circuits) that “trade or business” status under ERISA should be governed by a novel, multi-factor “investment plus-like” test rather than by this Court’s decisions defining “trade or business” status for purposes of Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) whether the First Circuit erred by holding, contrary to Whipple v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
  He cited section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code: § 213. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a warning to US taxpayers highlighting increasing efforts by cyber criminals to steal financial information. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Reported Declan McCullagh (CNET, April 10):The Internal Revenue Service doesn't believe it needs a search warrant to read your e-mail. [read post]