Search for: "General Electric CO." Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The PDA: The Early Years The PDA was enacted to reverse the Supreme Court’s 1976 ruling in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:32 pm by Patent Docs
A panel consisting of William Solander of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto; Kara Stoll of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP; and Dale Davis of General Electric Co. will discuss how to use recent case law to leverage secondary considerations to best advantage. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:47 am
  The report includes plenty of positive news and generated lots of headlines. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:44 am by Jim Sedor
In one instance, Hubbard had initially voted against a bill limiting lawsuits against the Doe Run Co. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  These annexed residents were formerly provided electricity by Red River Valley Co-op. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  These annexed residents were formerly provided electricity by Red River Valley Co-op. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  These annexed residents were formerly provided electricity by Red River Valley Co-op. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  These annexed residents were formerly provided electricity by Red River Valley Co-op. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  These annexed residents were formerly provided electricity by Red River Valley Co-op. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm by Joy Waltemath
Focusing mainly on GE’s right to control the conditions of a staffing agency employee’s work and its alleged role in her termination a few days after she complained about what she believed were racist statements by a coworker, a federal court in New York denied the company’s motion to dismiss her retaliation claims against it, reasoning that she sufficiently alleged that GE was her joint employer and that it could be held liable for her claims (Hexemer v General… [read post]