Search for: "Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc"
Results 101 - 120
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
A district court’s grant of summary judgment to the EEOC finding that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII by failing to provide a reasonable religious accommodation to a Muslim woman’s wearing of a headscarf or “hijab” was reversed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit (EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc, October 1, 2013, Holmes, J). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., (10th Cir., Oct. 1, 2013), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Abercrombie & Fitch in a case in which a Muslim applicant for employment who wore a hijab (Muslim headscarf) to her employment interview was not hired. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 4:44 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 11-cv-03162 (N.D. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-03162-YGR, U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Case No. 11-CV-03162 (N.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:43 am
Finding that Abercrombie & Fitch failed to raise a triable issue that a hardship, much less an undue one, would have resulted from allowing an employee to wear her hijab in contravention of its Look Policy—particularly where she had been wearing it for four months without any complaints, disruptions, or negative sales effects at the time she was discharged for refusing to remove it—a federal court in California granted summary judgment to the employee on the… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 6:42 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc., (ND CA, April 9, 2013), involves the question of whether Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it failed to hire a Muslim teenager, Halla Banafa, as a part-time stock-room employee. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 6:20 pm
This case may remind some followers of United States litigation of the Abercrombie & Fitch case, wherein A & B agreed to pay $40 million and improve diversity to settle that case. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:10 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:53 am
The Sixth Circuit had only yet adopted the competition theory of functionality in the case of Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:57 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc, No. 10-04866 (N.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 10 C 4866, 2011 WL 5903495 (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
(IPKat) 22 more “fake” Apple Stores found in China; how many more are there? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., an Oklahoma federal district court held that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by refusing to hire a Muslim teenager because her religious belief requiring her to wear a headscarf violates the company's "Look Policy" for sales models. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:21 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Case No. 09-CV-602-GKF-FHM). [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Case No. 09-CV-602-GKF-FHM). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:59 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx? [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Prince (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Abercrombie & Fitch – A&F sues in Seattle for cybersquatting and unfair competition (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Google – Trademark law doesn’t allow companies to silence competitors – Public Knowledge amicus brief in Rosetta Stone v Google (Public Knowledge) [read post]
