Search for: "Any Test Franchising, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
It is sacred; for, it is further declared, that the legislature shall have no power to add to, alter, abolish, or infringe any part of, the constitution. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:25 am
By Brian Hall On Jan. 25, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) addressed its independent contractor test in a case involving airport shuttle drivers for the franchise, SuperShuttle. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Source: TierneyMJ / shutterstock In announcing a decision in the SuperShuttle DFW, Inc. case on January 25, the Board returned to its former independent contractor standard, which reaffirms its adherence to the traditional common-law test used to classify workers as either employees or independent contractors. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In MMM Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
App., 1st Cir., Nov. 2, 2018). [5] UTELCOM, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:45 am
Jani-King of Oklahoma, Inc., October 3, 2018, McKay, M.). [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
This new test, called “ABC,” has never existed in any form of California law, either in statute or by regulation. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:50 am
College Hunks Hauling Junk Survives NAD Review with Name Intact The NAD recommended that CHHJ Franchising, LLC, modify claims that its franchise network of movers is a “nationwide” company that offers a “guarantee of the best services. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Civility is sorely tested. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
Examen, Inc., 871 A.2d 1108 (Del. 2005), the Delaware Supreme Court rejected CGCL Section 2115 on grounds that it violated the “internal affairs doctrine” under Delaware law, which provides that the law of the state of incorporation should govern any disputes regarding that corporation’s internal affairs. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 7:04 am
The case was to be a key litmus test of joint employer status under the Obama Board’s push to hold related entities accountable as joint employers for labor law violations—applying joint employer principles to the franchise business model, in particular. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
[it] exceeds any that this judge has seen in his nineteen years on the bench. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
In Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(likely relisted after June 21 conference) Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Franchises in Québec: Employee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Wayfair, Inc., Overstock.com, Inc., and Newegg, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:35 am
Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
Espeseth, Inc., 228 F. [read post]
