Search for: "Any Unknown Owners of Claimants"
Results 101 - 120
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
The claimant in a try title or quiet title case, the court ruled, must have some plausible ownership interest in the property, and Bevilacqua lacked any at this point in time. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
.*** Although they are a legal requirement for a variety of subjects – from large-scale construction projects, to small business owners and even in court cases - much is still unknown about surety bonds and what they protect. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
S. 465 (1926): “It is not unknown or indeed uncommon for the law to visit upon the owner of property the unpleasant consequences of the unauthorized action of one to whom he has entrusted it. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
The US moved to dismiss the counterclaims, arguing that they were a “legal nullity” — the defendant in an in rem proceeding is the property, not the claimant, and any claim the claimant may have against the government must be brought in a separate action. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
If “yes”, the second question arises: in all the circumstances, must the interest of the owner of the private information yield to the right of freedom of expression conferred on the publisher by article 10? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
If “yes”, the second question arises: in all the circumstances, must the interest of the owner of the private information yield to the right of freedom of expression conferred on the publisher by article 10? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
The claimants were the current owners, having purchased in 2007. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
The claimants were the current owners, having purchased in 2007. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:22 am
(e) An insurer has an affirmative defense to any such action if the third-party claimant, the insured, or their representatives fail to fully cooperate in providing all relevant information and in presenting the claim. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
Unknown Personal Representative of the Estate of SAMUEL E. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm
Those are the paragraphs in which it is alleged that the identity of the driver/owner was ascertainable and that the claimant has not complied with the Act in failing to make all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity of the unknown driver. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:56 am
231, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) may be the nominal defendant and liable for damages to the plaintiff for damages from a motor vehicle accident where the identities of the owner and driver of the other vehicle involved are not ascertained. [5] ICBC will only be liable as nominal defendant if the plaintiff has made “all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
As any lawyer knows, before you march off to court to issue a complaint on the behalf of your client you generally need four things: A claimant, at least one defendant, a cause of action and evidence is also quite nice. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
"22 The Act was not intended to apply to errors and omissions coverage written on a "claims made" basis for persons such as design professionals.The first part also addresses an insurer’s duty to defend a construction professional against a property owner’s notice of claim served under CDARA. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
All of the remedies are cumulative to any remedies that are available to claimants, such as those contained in the Uniform Commercial Code. 56:8-2.13. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
In that case, the claimant’s private travel journals had been disclosed by one of his former employees. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
Many states have a process whereby an inactive account escheats to the state after it is not requested by its rightful owner. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
Generally, the claimant is required to front fees and costs. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
The man did not bother to obtain the name of the driver or owner of the vehicle because he did not plan to make any claim. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
I would also limit such an exception to those who could not know they might have a claim in the bankruptcy case - thus, current owners of Chrysler cars could be given notice and forced to file a claim, no matter how contingent, but future owners of already manufactured defective Chryslers and those who have yet to be run over by these defective cars would seem to have a good argument that the Bankruptcy Code, and Congress' power under the… [read post]
