Search for: "B&B PARTNERS" Results 101 - 120 of 10,731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Following the 2023 bank failures, bank regulators continue to scrutinize the regulatory compliance of financial technology (fintech) companies, particularly those companies partnering with banks in the payments space. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
New and Recently Updated Practical Guidance Content Conservation Easements, Donor Advised Funds, and Sponsoring Organizations: Governing Principles Partnership Taxation: Partner Contributions under Code Section 721(a) Tax-Exempt Organizations Compliance Labor Department Releases Independent Contractor Final Rule, Revising Standard U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am by Unknown
Macquarie’s stock price fell around 41 percent.In a complaint filed in the Southern District of New York, Moab Partners, L. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
Moab Partners, L.P., a case from the Second Circuit addressing the ability to rely on a failure to disclose certain information in accordance with the requirements of Item 303 of Regulation S-K as a basis to state a securities fraud claim under SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:30 am by sinclair
  ABA Rule 7.2(b) outlines strict rules concerning how you may obtain and use client testimonials. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Lyle Roberts
Moab Partners, L.P. holding that the failure to disclose information required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K can support a Rule 10b-5(b) claim only if the omission renders affirmative statements misleading. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/503(b) Property earned during the marriage but paid out after the marriage may still be deemed a marital, and thus divisible) asset. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:13 am by ocgdev
Partnering with or hiring a skilled "of counsel" attorney specializing in these areas could also benefit your practice, allowing for an efficient response to increased demand. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm by Kaufman Dolowich
” This article is from Part B News and provide a link back to their website: https://pbn.decisionhealth.com/ Part B News – 04.08.24 – Patient assault office restrictions – Alexander The post Patient Assault Underlines Need For Tight Office Entry Restrictions, article quote by Abbye Alexander, Esq. in Part B News, 4-4-2024 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
 The largest holder of publicly traded stock of Yellow Corp., MFN Partners, also objected to the motion, asserting that the value of its equity holdings would be determined by whether or not the claims were allowed. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
On March 26th of this year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that further review in Amazon Logistics v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:01 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
That’s, that’s really what we’ve been delivering up till now, both with our kind of associate workflow, persona, and then more recently to partners and general counsel’s, but where I think the overlap really appeared. [read post]