Search for: "B&D Properties, LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2013, 10:36 am by John L. Welch
Christopher Brooks d/b/a The Cab Calloway Orchestra, Civil Action No. 09-CIV-10488 (CS) (SDNY Dec. 27, 2012). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:06 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
North Carolina General Statutes Section 50-20(b) (4) defines divisible property. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am by MBettman
Then, in October 2003, Magnum transferred title to 112 Parker Court, LLC (“Parker Court”)—again without an express provision reserving any rental payments associated with the property. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Peter’s Unsuccessful Appeal Peter’s appeal from the judgment sought reversal of the lower court’s judgment and orders (a) enforcing his expulsion and (b) determining the net value of his membership interests. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
In this case, Robbins and Lutz appealed from the opinion and order of the Fayette Circuit Court dismissing their claim against the Lexington–Fayette Urban County Planning Commission and New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC d/b/a AT & T Mobility. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:19 am by Kenan Farrell
R&R Medical, LLC d/b/a Bear KompleX (ND, filed 5/26/2021) – The Defendant’s response deadline has been extended to August 30, 2021. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:43 am
Hammond, Indiana - Chanel's Salon, LLC, d/b/a Chanel's Salon and Chanel's Cosmetology Salon, and Chanel Jones, all of Merrillville, Indiana, entered into a consent judgment with Chanel, Inc. of New York, New York to resolve ongoing trademark disputes regarding the trademarked term CHANEL®. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Three-member LLC’s sole asset is long-term commercial lease. 40% Member A buys out 60% Members B and C for $1.5 million. [read post]
In NP Texas LLC d/b/a Texas Station Gambling Hall and Hotel and Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, 370 NLRB No. 11 (2020), the Board found that the Regional Director erred in scheduling the election given that the laid-off employees had no “reasonable expectation of recall” and thus were ineligible to vote. [read post]