Search for: "B RICHARDSON"
Results 101 - 120
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
The CARES Act enabled any taxpayer with an RMD due in 2020 from a defined-contribution retirement plan, including a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, or an IRA, to skip those RMDs this year. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:53 am
Lindsey B. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Richardson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:17 pm
Lindsey B. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm
HCSM Definition The proposed regulations draw their definition of a “health care sharing ministry” from section 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the Code, which provides that the individual shared responsibility payment (which is zero after December 31, 2018) does not apply to an individual who is a member of a health care sharing ministry. as an organization. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
INTRODUCTION In my post last week, I blogged the background to an analysis of constitutional challenges to interprovincial border closures. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:33 am
” USSG § 4B1.2(b). [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Any other civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort, except that the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon any express or implied contract… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:42 am
Lindsey B. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
• Patricia B. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 8:01 pm
Lindsey B. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686 (1973). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:33 am
” Finding itself bound by Richardson, the court determined that the trial court did not err in its instruction to the jury on self-defense. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But the key takeaways from Wallace for our purposes are that a) what we are dealing with is loss of amenity, and b) there is no fixed attachment to the rent level. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But the key takeaways from Wallace for our purposes are that a) what we are dealing with is loss of amenity, and b) there is no fixed attachment to the rent level. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am
" This position is based on a rather egregious mis-reading of the leading Supreme Court case on the matter, Richardson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays the School of Government from swift completion of their case summaries. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:24 pm
See Richardson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
It’s over. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
For instance: The changes in 29 CFR 4006.5(f)(3), which deal with premium proration for short plan years where the plan’s assets are distributed in a termination, are applicable to plan years beginning in or after 2020; The changes in 29 CFR 4010.7(a)(2), § 4010.9(b)(2), and § 4010.11(a)(1)(i), which deal with identifying legal relationships of controlled group members, consolidated financial statements, and calculating the funding… [read post]
