Search for: "Craig B Cooper" Results 101 - 113 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
AALS Committee on International Cooperation Luncheon. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under section 271(f):… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Eugene Bernat, President) Bay State Animal Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design valid… [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 10:23 am
 Officials are investigating on whether Lehman Brothers Holdings mislead the public by announcing their intentions to file for bankruptcy and effectively drove their stock value to the floor. [19] B. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:01 am
The Stros 2008 season has been over for over a week now, so it's time for my final review of the 2008 season (prior 2008 season reviews are here) and my grading of the Stros players for the 2008 seaons (my grading of the Stros from the 2007 season is here and from the 2006 season is here). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Craig, Daily Mail staffSex Offender Issues, Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
Importantly, the Act does not specify that such clinicians must be forensic experts, and suggests a risk assessment may still be made even if the offender does not cooperate fully (or at all) in the examination process.Section 8 outlines what these assessment reports must entail: (a) whether the 'offender has a propensity to commit relevant offences in the future'; (b) their 'pattern and progression' of sexual offending, and the 'nature of any likely future… [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35072.htm The Board, reversing the administrative law judge, found that the Respondent did not violate Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain over its new policy that precluded union-represented employees from purchasing apartments at its cooperative apartment complex. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:35 am
Cheney Matthew Cooper John Dickerson Jack Eckinroad (?) [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]