Search for: "Creative Concepts, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am by James Williams
The following is a list of examples of things that cannot be copyrighted: Ideas, procedures, methods, systems, processes, concepts, principles, discoveries, devices. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
FTJ, Inc. f/k/a Ciesco, Inc., the Court found that under the facts of the case, FTJ, the supplier to a subcontractor of Davis Construction could recover against Davis Construction using a theory of unjust enrichment. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
He noted that, to determine whether the claimant's fabric qualifies as such, it would be necessary to determine whether the employee who created it "was both (a) a craftsman in that he or she made the fabric in a skilful way, taking justified pride in his workmanship and (b) was an artist in that he or she used their creative ability to produce something which has aesthetic appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
Judge Michael Fitzgerald in the District Court concluded “By 2001, American popular culture was heavily steeped in the concepts of players, haters, and player haters … The concept of actors acting in accordance with their essential nature is not at all creative; it is banal. [read post]