Search for: "D'or Fashions, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm
Here's the latest complaint, this one filed against Twitter in the Southern District of New York: Cain Et Al, No 1 17 Cv 00122 (S D N Y Jan 08, 2017), COMPLAINT Against Twitter, Inc (2) (PDF)Cain Et Al, No 1 17 Cv 00122 (S D N Y Jan 08, 2017), COMPLAINT Against Twitter, Inc (2) (Text) I don't have a lot new to say about this issue in light of this latest complaint. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:12 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, writ dism'd w.o.j.). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:12 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, writ dism'd w.o.j.). [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:58 am
The unnecessary reaching for polysyllabic words is an old-fashioned form of humor. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
But I thought I’d pass along a quick summary of the Federal Circuit opinions, which I posted last year. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In so doing, the panel rejected the objector's argument that, for purposes of the CLRA claim, the published notice was deficient because it failed to comport with Civil Code section 1781(d). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Resource Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
BCF Avocats d’affaires (2016)) https://t.co/9bhQrAphc8 -> Link to US Scotus opinion on enhanced damages in patent cases , Halo v Pulse https://t.co/vpXI1MQmc4 -> Cable companies launch court battle against 'free TV' Android box vendors https://t.co/nXbDK1iEx6 -> Courtroom to riches? [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
Even the USPTO now regrets having originally issued Apple's D'677 patent, which covers little more than a round button. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
'No problem.'; We've all got problems, but keeping up with the IPKat ain't one. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
§82.005(d)(2) (emphasis added). [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:26 am
LEXIS 52405 (D. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:21 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
I am going to proceed in this post in a fashion that differs in one respect from how I usually translate a court’s opinion into a blog post: I usually go through the entire opinion, explaining what the court did and why. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
I’d Rather Be [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:35 am
Furthermore, "touch" is descriptive and less important in the Section 2(d) analysis.The Board was unconvinced. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
Unless the Santa impersonators are bringing your goodwill into disrepute by way of the usual antics (drunkenness, "kissing Mommy", etc), you would be better off focusing your attentions elsewhere - perhaps by investing the legal spend in some good ol' fashioned R&D. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
.'” And by finding HEEB and SQUAW VALLEY disparaging, the PTO necessarily did so based on its finding that the marks convey an expressive message over and above their function as source identifiers — namely, an expressive message disparaging Jewish and Native American people. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
See Case Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
See Case Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
