Search for: "D. Garza" Results 101 - 120 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2015, 5:01 am by Cyrus Farivar
Carlos Garza, a former employee of a now-collapsed Bitcoin mining company, must respond to a subpoena as part of an ongoing fraud investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled on Tuesday. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Judge Garza, in a concurring opinion, would have gone further and declared that plaintiffs’ expert witness Rosenthal had no methodology and thus she was free to opine ad libitum. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Perhaps Judge Garza, who dissented in both cases, needs to prepare a dramatic TV spot explaining why review is warranted. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Also back this week is the duo of high-profile three-time relists arising from Fifth Circuit opinions with Judge Garza dissents: Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 3:22 pm by Schachtman
Judge Garza, in a concurring opinion, would have gone further and declared that plaintiffs’ expert witness Rosenthal had no methodology and thus she was free to opine ad libitum. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
DAVID NELSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A COLLECTIVE CONTRACTING, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP; AND E.E. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Schooler, April 3, 2015 SEC Fails to Establish Regulation D Violations by Matthew Garza, J.D. in Jim Hamilton’s World of Securities Litigation 17 CFR 230.506 – Exemption for limited offers and sales without regard to dollar amount of offering Real Estate Investment Fraud or Securities Fraud? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:32 am by John Jascob
[This story previously appeared in Securities Regulation Daily.]By Matthew Garza, J.D.Congressman Stephen F. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 7:54 am by Bob Kraft
The AP reports that the victim, identified as Carlos Solis, was killed “when an air bag inflated and sent shrapnel into his neck,” according to Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:17 am by John Jascob
Exchange Act Sec. 19(d)(2) says that SRO action shall be subject to regulatory review on its own motion, or “upon application by any person aggrieved. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]