Search for: "D. STRICKLAND"
Results 101 - 120
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:32 am
So here are a few links for those of you interested in mindful writing.First, here's an old post on the topic written after I'd attended a seminar taught by Professor Donna Strickland. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had families walk into my office after accepting an offer like this only to be told that there is nothing that can be done for them after they realized they’d lost more than what the trucking company elected to pay for. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) outside the context of a capital sentencing hearing. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
The standards created by Strickland and § 2254(d) are both highly deferential, and when the two apply in tandem, review is doubly so. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
This is one situation that really needs a much closer look, and I’d be curious to know what witnesses may have seen. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
MJG–11–3332 (D. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:14 pm
Smack [, 347 F.3d 533 (3d Cir. 2003)] and Strickland. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The court concluded that the claim does not bear on petitioner's custody.In Strickland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 7:28 pm
” Eze, 321 F3d at 128 (internal citations omitted).As the Second Circuit has explained “[d]efense counsel may not fail to conduct an investigation and then rely on the resulting ignorance to excuse his failure to explore a strategy that would likely have yielded exculpatory evidence. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
§ 2254(d). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:24 pm
In the analysis of (d), the Court echoed the requirement of a less rigid application of these factors. [read post]
