Search for: "Daniel Watts"
Results 101 - 120
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2015, 4:44 pm
Confirmed commentators currently include Michael Asimow (Stanford), Daniel Farber (Berkeley), Kristin Hickman (Minnesota), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Peter Shane (Ohio State), Glen Staszewski (Michigan State), and Kathryn Watts (Washington). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:05 pm
Yet more: Daniel Fisher/Forbes (“San Antonio car wreck attorney” goes for $670 per click on Google), Tampa Bay Times (“Highly groomed attorney duo …shown moving in slow motion on courthouse steps to a hard rock beat”); Flurry of other new papers by U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
Among the scheduled presenters are Nadine El-Enany (Birkbeck) Julen Etxabe (Helsinki) Adam Gearey (Birkbeck) Silvija Jestrovic (Warwick) Daniel Matthews (Hong Kong) Rashmi Varma (Warwick) Scott Veitch (Hong Kong) Marco Wan (Hong Kong) Gary Watt (Warwick) Andrew Williams (Warwick)Among the questions the workshop will address: How might Law and Humanities enable us to make sense of a setting of popular dissensus, of widespread economic, political and… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The workshop is free but pre-registration is required.Here is a list of confirmed participants.Nadine El-Enany (Birkbeck)Julen Etxabe (Helsinki)Adam Gearey (Birkbeck)Silvija Jestrovic (Warwick)Daniel Matthews (Hong Kong)Rashmi Varma (Warwick)Scott Veitch (Hong Kong)Marco Wan (Hong Kong)Gary Watt (Warwick)Andrew Williams (Warwick) More here from the blog Critical Legal Thinking. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 6:38 am
Speaking of Israel and Palestine, Daniel Reisner brought us Part 1 of his reflections on the U.N. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
On that note, in the Foreign Policy Essay, Stephen Watts and Sean Mann pondered the topic of “Afghanistan after the Drawdown. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:33 am
Clint Watts outlines a “Guide to Reading the New Bin Laden Documents” in War on the Rocks. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:05 am
"How is this possible? [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:45 am
Watts. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:31 pm
The judges repeatedly challenged the statements of Daniel Voelker—the attorney defending Steele, Hansmeier, and Duffy—and that's when things were going well for the once-vigorous copyright enforcer. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:25 am
Réflexions à propos du contrat d’assurance Paul LAGARDE (Université Paris I)La fraude en matière de nationalité Pierre MAYER (Université Paris I)Le poids des témoignages dans l’arbitrage international Horatia MUIR WATT (Sciences Po)L’émergence du réseau et le droit international privé Marie-Laure NIBOYET (Université Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense)Les remèdes à la… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:54 am
There were further findings of not guilty on charges of assaulting his third son and depriving his wife of her credit and debit cards.Toronto criminal lawyer Daniel Brown suggests the ruling was a “unique judgment” given that criminal harassment normally involves things like excessively calling a spouse who has left the home or a relationship rather than, as in this case, the defendant’s actions while the family was still together. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:51 am
Per Jack’s recommendation, check out FP‘s whole lineup on Syria, courtesy of Phillp Bobbitt, Daniel Byman, Norm Ornstein and others. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:35 am
Herron and Daniel A. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:07 am
Lewis, (American University) Johns Hopkins University * Jean Herskovits Daniel J. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
Daniel Fisher also has coverage for Forbes. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:15 pm
Thanks to Daniel Watts for the pointer. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Sometimes legal counsel take positions in court determined solely by the expediency of what expert witnesses are available, and what opinions are held by those witnesses. [read post]
