Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 9:05 pm
Therefore, the individual who is unemployed or does not have employment that provides health insurance must purchase uncoordinated no-fault insurance. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:03 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:30 am
OCR noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:03 am
In Moore v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:25 am
This supposedly increases the cost of healthcare services, and does not allow health plans to be selective about the hospitals or providers that may have lower costs or higher quality care. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
Those states object to Planned Parenthood providing access to abortion outside Medicaid, which does not cover the procedure. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:46 am
Reese v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
Dignity Health, (ND CA, March 17, 2014), a California federal district court refused to permit an interlocutory appeal of a decision holding that the pension plan for employees of Dignity Health, a 16-state non-profit Catholic healthcare provider, does not qualify for the "church plan" exemption in ERISA. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:44 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
Collective bargaining agreement requires village to reimburse its retirees participating in its health insurance plan their Medicare premiumsMillington v Village of S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:10 pm
Militello v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:43 am
Monday’s argument in Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:55 am
It could have relied, as it often does in hard cases, on a default presumption of statutory interpretation, like federalism, to provide an uncomplicated way out. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:18 am
It took nine years in the case of Butler v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
She has never devised a realistic repayment plan, or any repayment plan, which is the very purpose of the statutory scheme; (5) There is no relevant evidence of Ms Lees’ mental health condition, in particular as to severity, prognosis and duration. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
Does an employee organization have any right to challenge a unilateral change in the health insurance plan made by the "third party? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Mead v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
