Search for: "Does 1-180"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
"The train to Haar - new location of the EBAThe consequences if the appeal does not comply with Article 108 EPC are provided by Rule 101(1) EPC: "If the appeal does not comply with Articles 106 to 108, Rule 97 or Rule 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as inadmissible, unless any deficiency has been remedied before the relevant period under Article 108 has expired. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
Ames does in fact cite structure and materials similar to the claimed invention. ... [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
However, Alliance did not file its petition until three days later on November 1, 2010. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiff — Randall Moon — filed a complaint under the Illinois Wrongful Act (740 ILCS 180/1, et seq.) and the Survival Act (755 ILCS 5/27-6). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
The FDA approved Actavis’ first-to-file generic product, which entitled Actavis to 180 days of exclusivity from the initial commercial marketing of its drug. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
The FDA approved Actavis’ first-to-file generic product, which entitled Actavis to 180 days of exclusivity from the initial commercial marketing of its drug. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:11 pm
So what is in the regulations: 1. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:08 pm
Div. 1987), though Wrotny does not explicitly hold as much. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:02 am
The December 2005 memo explains that just you leave the employer before 180 days, does not make you ineligible to port to similar employment. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:35 pm
In Cook County and Chicago, effective July 1, 2017, there is a sick leave “ordinance” that goes into effect 180 days after employment begins. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
In this scenario, the Crown obviously appealed the sections 12, 15 and 1 findings. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:30 am
The employee’s first, and critical step, is to file a claim with OSHA within 180 days from the date of retaliation. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:08 am
DC Code 22-404(a)(1) covers the charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 180 days. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
Slip op., at 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:22 pm
Does it continue to run, or does it stop? [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:50 am
He said that GPS ground stations in Russian territory would have to shut down on June 1 unless the US agreed to allow Russia to establish similar stations for GLONASS in the US. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:14 am
• Call 1-888-407-4747 toll-free in the United States and Canada or 1-202-501-4444 from other countries from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:10 am
Although the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Section 4E(a)(1) to require the SEC to bring the action within 180 days, the SEC said it was not applicable since Congress never said what the consequences if it failed to do so. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:21 am
Does that matter? [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Applying Hendershot, the court held that the 180-day rule does not require that trial be commenced so as to be completed within the 180-day period; instead, the rule is satisfied if the prosecutor acts in good faith well within the period and proceeds promptly toward readying the case for trial. [read post]
