Search for: "Does 1-237"
Results 101 - 120
of 594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2014, 6:25 am
Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1, held that DUIs are not, without other aggravating circumstances, deportable. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
How does this affect our business? [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
Harris, 568 U.S. 237, 244 (2013)). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
What Happens if the Attorney Does Not Win? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:56 am
At the end of the grace period, tenant does not want to move out, and eventually sues attorney for malpractice. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
At the end of the grace period, tenant does not want to move out, and eventually sues attorney for malpractice. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:08 am
At the end of the grace period, tenant does not want to move out, and eventually sues attorney for malpractice. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am
On 23 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its ruling in Gömböc, C-237/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:296, concerning the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of the previous Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 (now Article 4(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of Directive 2015/2436). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Never Too Late 237 [Week ending 13th October] Fighting for your IP rights in Denmark – it’s expensive, but now maybe less so? [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Supp.2d at 613 n.1. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 6:41 pm
1. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
237/08 Google France v Viaticum LutecielViaticum and Luteciel own French trade marks ‘bourse des vols’, ‘bourse des voyages’ and ‘BDV’. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(Preib's Rule 24 Motion to Intervene, ECF No. 237 at ¶ 1.) [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
Dissent at 1–3, 8–9. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
On 1 July last year, the IPKat carried a note, "When groovy fingers don't make for good trade marks", by young barrister Katherine Moggridge (a pupil at 3 New Square) on a decision of the United Kingdom's Trade Mark Registry, O-237-13 Société des Produuits Nestlé SA's application; opposition of Cadbury UK Ltd. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Fusting (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 404, 411; but see People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
Supp. 3d 237, 246 (D.D.C. 2020) (“[USCIS] cannotsimply rely on the OOH’s recognition that an unspecified number of contrary cases exist. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:23 pm
Does an employee, independent contractor, or corporate officer own original copyrightable materials authored by that person in conjunction with the relationship to the employer? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
The member (plaintiff) does not have an attorney-client relationship with the attorney. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court had granted Plaintiff's CPLR Article 78 petition seeking [1] to annul a determination by the appointing authority [Employer] terminating Plaintiff from his position and [2] an order reinstating him to his former position with back pay. [read post]
