Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 101 - 120 of 5,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
The PTO form PTO/SB/64 also includes a number of statements of situations that are not unintentional abandonment: Petitioner is reminded that a delay resulting from a deliberately chosen course of action on the part of the applicant does not become an “unintentional” delay within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.137 because: the applicant does not consider the claims to be patentable over the references relied upon in an outstanding Office action; the applicant… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
Access Copyright shall pay to the Plaintiffs post-judgment interest on the Overpayment, calculated pursuant to subsection 37(1) of the Federal Courts Act. 8. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Copeland-Chatterson Co. (1906), 37 S.C.R. 651 at 653; Gillette v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The option grant gave Musk an additional 1% of the company each time the company hit one of 12 increasingly difficult operational and financial goals. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
When filing an application with the USPTO, all applicants have a duty to disclose any and all prior art relevant to the examination of that application that they are aware of (37 CFR § 1.56). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
  This reduction to practice alone likely does not rise to a significant contribution for inventorship. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]