Search for: "Donald C. Grant"
Results 101 - 120
of 630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 3:58 am
In contrast to Donald Trump’s “tough” approach to U.S. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court majority for something like Justice Alito’s draft would not exist were it not for then-Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s stonewalling of President Barack Obama’s nominee, Donald Trump’s unexpected 2016 Electoral College v [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:50 pm
Granted, Jae owns her own business, but my first thought was, “Is taking off that much time even allowed? [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:21 am
Criminal defense attorney Robert J. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The decision granted a summary judgment and was thus based entirely on Judge Mizelle’s view of the law. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:27 pm
Lee & Stephen C. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
The court granted Trump’s request to dismiss the § 1986, emotional distress, and negligence claims. 9. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Canada The Michael Geist blog has an article criticising the Government’s defence of the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
Grant. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
Events The Bonavero Institute, University of Oxford, is hosting an online lecture by Vicki C Jackson titled Knowledge Institutions in Constitutional Democracies: Reflections on “the Press” on 22 March 2022, 15:00-16:30. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 6:55 am
Given the enormous economic success, the suggestion that Bill C-11 solves an economic problem simply doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
§ 1052(c). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
The Board found that the mark "comprises the name of [former] president Donald Trump without his written consent" and it rejected Applicant Steve Elster's First Amendment challenge to the constitutionality of Section 2(c). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
Nonetheless, the PTO applied Section 2(c), determined that, unsurprisingly, the record did not contain any evidence that Trump consented to the registration of a mark calling his policies and “some features” too small, and therefore declined to grant the registration. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Michael DiMassa that raises the total amount of federal grant money he is accused of stealing to more than $1 million and brings new theft and conspiracy charges against his wife and two associates. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 1:10 am
42 U.S.C. 802(c)(2)(A). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
by Michael C. [read post]
