Search for: "E. C. " Results 101 - 120 of 37,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 4:38 pm by Public Employment Law Press
SUN-08-24-00012-E Filing No. 371 Filing Date: 2024-04-23 Effective Date: 2024-04-23 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action: Action taken: Amendment of sections 335.11, 335.17 and Appendix B-1 of Title 8 NYCRR. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:38 pm by Public Employment Law Press
SUN-08-24-00012-E Filing No. 371 Filing Date: 2024-04-23 Effective Date: 2024-04-23 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action: Action taken: Amendment of sections 335.11, 335.17 and Appendix B-1 of Title 8 NYCRR. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:02 pm
As indicated in paragraph 31(e) of the report on the 9th session, the legal experts should represent different legal systems and their selection should aim at geographical and gender balance. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:57 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- following in camera review of sample documents, deciding that: (1) FBI improperly relied on Exemption 7(C) to redact race, ethnic information, and nationality of people investigated, because disclosure would not increase risk of identification; (2) FBI properly withheld various categories of records pursuant to Exemption 7(E); (3) FBI met its burden to show that the withheld information could not be further segregated and released. [read post]
See California Business and Professions Code §§ 26001, 26051.5(a)(5)(A)-(E); 4 CCR § 15002(c)(19), 4 CCR § 15023(b), and 4 CCR § 17801 (collectively the “LPA Sections”). [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:05 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Permanent authorization of E-Verify and a requirement that it become mandatory for all employers (with a likely phase-in period based on employer size). [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:32 pm by Bridget Crawford
Roesler, University of Iowa College of Law Joanna C. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:30 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Die Behörden möchten ihre Zusammenarbeit bei der Überwachung dieser Datenverarbeitungen, wie in der E-Mail vom 16. [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
Pix credit here The Hong Kong National Security law has attracted a substantial amount of attention outside of HR-SAR (eg here, here), and generated the start of what is likely to be a lively judicial debate (eg here). [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Crevier c. [read post]