Search for: "Eli Lilly and Company Inc"
Results 101 - 120
of 411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2015, 2:15 pm
Additionally, security company Mandiant published a report finding that the Chinese government is sponsoring cyber-espionage to attack top U.S. companies. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:03 pm
Eli Lilly and Company et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, in conjunction with Washington, D.C. co-counsel, sued for patent infringement in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:50 am
” Announcement of the proposed legislation was joined by a letter of support on behalf of the Association of Global Automakers, Inc., Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), The Boeing Company, Boston Scientific, BSA | The Software Alliance (BSA), Caterpillar Inc., Corning Incorporated, Eli Lilly and Company, General Electric, Honda, IBM, Illinois Tool Works Inc., Intel, International Fragrance Association, North America,… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Mylan Laboratories Limited of Hyderabad, India; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Morgantown, West Virginia; and Mylan Inc. of Canonsburg, Pennsylvania (collectively, "Mylan") infringed Patent No. 7,772,209 ("the 209 patent"), which covers the pharmaceutical product Alimta®. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with non-Indiana co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly Export S.A. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
In the admirably brief Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015) , Lord Justice Floyd (Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues - one on which nothing turns in the end (although it has important wider significance), and one which has the result that this case seems set to run and run.The claimBut let's recap a bit. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:53 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd of Yamaguchi, Japan filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that HEC Pharm USA, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey and HEC Pharm Co. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
SJS/TEN is somewhat analogous in our sandbox to mesothelioma in asbestos cases, since plaintiffs often work backwards from the diagnosis to look for some drug company to sue. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 the Supreme Court reversed the findings of the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:00 am
Eli Lily and Company, 2015 ONCA 305 [55] This is not a bilateral context where Apotex is the only party that has been wronged by Lilly. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent lawyer for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd of Yamaguchi, Japan (collectively "Lilly") sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Lupin Ltd. of Mumbai, India and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of Baltimore, Maryland infringed Patent Nos. 8,569,325, titled… [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
As an example if one considers how inventive step was assessed in Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited [2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat) (see Katpost here) one sees that for a pharmaceutical formulation the following criteria may be relevant:* obvious to try * reasonable expectation of success * prejudice * inventive selection * the Technograph test (Technograph v Mills & Rockley [1972] RPC 346) * synergyMr Justice Birss… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:35 am
A federal jury in Lafayette, Louisiana, last year awarded a massive $9 billion in damages against Takeda and Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:13 pm
A federal jury in Lafayette, Louisiana, last year awarded a massive $9 billion in damages against Takeda and Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
The company’s main goal was “to protect the product,” Miller added. 4,000 Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits in Federal Court There are more than 4,000 product liability lawsuits filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, which allege that Actos diabetic medication caused patients to develop bladder cancer. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
The company’s main goal was “to protect the product,” Miller added. 4,000 Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits in Federal Court There are more than 4,000 product liability lawsuits filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, which allege that Actos diabetic medication caused patients to develop bladder cancer. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement by Sandoz Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey of ALIMTA®, Patent No. 7,772,209, which was issued by the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
