Search for: "Evans v. Social Security" Results 101 - 120 of 271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
§ 404.1520(a)(4)(v), available to an applicant for social security benefits on the basis of a disability, when the expert fails upon the applicant’s request to provide the underlying data on which that testimony is premised. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Sex and gender, in Shapiro’s view, are biological, not socially constructed.All of this is a bit mysterious, if one takes the professed libertarianism seriously. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
That case involves a provision of the Social Security Act providing that: Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant … who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  The new scheme was criticised in a post on Inforrm by Evan Harris and by Brian Cathcart on Byline. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected the most important disputes in Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
Hayley Evans summarized the ruling handed down by the U.K. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
One way forward for universities after Access Copyright v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, featuring their discussion of the indictments, ACLU v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:49 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Although this approach minimizes security concerns, recent research by Meredith Rossner, et. al. suggests that jurors are subconsciously influenced by this social cue of dangerousness, and this has an impact on verdicts. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am by Christine Corcos
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]