Search for: "Fox Television Stations, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al, the Court found that this policy, as applied to Fox and ABC, was impermissibly vague in violation of these broadcasters’ due process rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al, the Court found that this policy, as applied to Fox and ABC, was impermissibly vague in violation of these broadcasters’ due process rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al, the Court found that this policy, as applied to Fox and ABC, was impermissibly vague in violation of these broadcasters’ due process rights. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
Fox Television Stations, Inc. nears, a brief history of indecency regulation may be of interest and begins with a tie to music. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:50 am by David Oxenford
Fox Television Stations and ABC, Inc. and observed that “the Supreme Court itself may soon declare that the era of special broadcast exemption from strict scrutiny is over. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:17 pm by Doug Isenberg
The newest lawsuit against News Corp’s Fox, the Public Broadcasting Service, Univision Communications Inc. and the WPIX and WNET stations in the New York area was filed in the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
Fox Television Stations Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Fox Television Stations, Inc.) and concludes that “[t]he confusion of courts, broadcasters and the viewing public is understandable, but the remedies are less evident. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
Fox Television Stations, Inc., involving a challenge to the constitutionality of the FCC’s indecency regime. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Fox Television Stations, Inc., the Court will consider whether the Federal Communications Commission’s standards for indecency on television are too vague to be constitutional. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm by Barry Barnett
Fox Television Stations, Inc., No. 10-1293, Transcript at 51:20-52:8 (emphasis ours). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Fox Television Stations (expected 2012) and by Brown v. [read post]