Search for: "HARPER v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 101 - 120
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Texas. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
(ArsTechnica) Google announces changes to better protect copyright on the Internet (ArsTechnica) (PlagiarismToday) (Public Knowledge) Anti-piracy campaign clothes, now for babies – IRIS campaign (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records – Court files reveal EMI promoted music on ‘piracy haven’ RapidShare : Capitol Records v MP3Tunes (TorrentFreak) Crippen – Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting and Harper & Row v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
(IPBiz) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas jury invalidates one of EFF’s ‘most wanted’ patents: Bright Response LLC v Google, Yahoo! [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:02 am
A new Texas appellate decision, Inliner Americas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Harper (San Antonio, TX)MGM v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais was quoted in “The Road Less Traveled,” in the America Lawyer’s “Taming Texas” cover story, which referred to his two recent defense jury verdicts in the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
Power Ventures (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Whitney Harper - Peer to peer defendant seeks Supreme Court review of ‘innocent infringer’ ruling (Copyrights & Campaigns) Worldwide Film Entertainment - Anonymous accused Bittorrent user moves to quash subpoena using real name: Worldwide Film Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
On March 26, an East Texas jury ordered U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
If this sounds like your kind of good time, come on down for a visit before Texas follows through on its threats to secede from the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Intellectual Property Directions) USPTO to hold Innovation Week 22-27 June (Patent Docs) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Obama’s environmentally-friendly present for supporters of the patent system (IAM) How to cut legal costs and improve results in troubled times (IP Frontline) PatentCluster – free clustering based patent search engine (Patent Baristas) Requesting withdrawal of the finality of an office action… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
We call it 36-21 for Clemson.Update: Clemson won by 49-26 as Cullen Harper set a school record with 5 touchdown passes.This week we are : 7-2 in predicting the game winner, 5-4 against the spread.Colorado State is a 14-point underdog at home to California. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
