Search for: "IPR Licensing Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Hazeltine Research, Inc., 339 U.S. 827, 836 (1950) (“The general rule is that the licensee under a patent license agreement may not challenge the validity of the licensed patent in a suit for royalties due under the contract. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple, Inc., et al., No. 15-842 (IPR institution decisions unreviewable, even when addressed in a final written decision by PTAB) Post Grant Admin: Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple, Inc., et al., No. 15-842 (IPR institution decisions unreviewable, even when addressed in a final written decision by PTAB) Post Grant Admin: Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-446 (BRI construction in IPRs; institution decisions unreviewable) Post Grant Admin: Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:22 am
However in a more recent challenge to US Patent 6773720B1, owned by Cosmo Technologies but licensed to Shire Pharmaceuticals, he has had a degree of success. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:15 am by Gregory B. Williams
Wistron Corp., Civil Action No. 15-478-LPS (D.Del., June 18, 2015), the Court granted the emergency motion of Plaintiffs, InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., and InterDigital Patent Holding, Inc., to remand the action to the Delaware Chancery Court. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:58 am by Docket Navigator
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Getty Images (US), Inc., CBM2015-00023 (PTAB May 21, 2015, Order) (Tierney, APJ) Is the PTAB more likely to institute an IPR if the district court stays concurrent litigation? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Intellectual Ventures and Xilinx Inc had been scheduled for trial this month. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am by Jim Singer
Divided infringement: In a 2014 opinion (Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
CJ Prost began the opinion:InterDigital Communications, Inc., InterDigital Tech-nology Corporation, and IPR Licensing, Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Northern (de)lights: the Nordic IPR ForumJeremy presents the Nordic IPR Forum, which will take place on 25 to 26 March 2015 in the Brewery Conference Centre, Stockholm, preceded by a pre-conference workshop on 24 March. [read post]