Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 101 - 120 of 30,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 2:22 pm
Clearly.But if you want to order restitution, you've got to do so before the two-year (or whatever) mental health diversion is over and you're about to dismiss the charges.Not after.So holds the Court of Appeal, reversing the trial court.Again: An easy decision to follow, as long as you know of it.Which now everyone (hopefully) does. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  However, the case would give Justice Gorsuch a chance to more fully connect the federalism canon and MQD (as he began to do in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
After rage-tweeting throughout the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:13 am by Dylan Gibbs
Auer; Transalta v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]